[450] Packet on 450

[George Andrews]

How about THOR?

 

From: 450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com [mailto:450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com]
On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 10:12 AM
To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450

 

What protocol will you be using?  I'll connect now!

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:01 PM, chris <cralt at comcast.net> wrote:

I hear no one on 450.. i guess i'll start up a packet BBS there :-/




On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:35 PM, William Knapp / KC1WJ wrote:

Super awesome! Now I can put my radio back on.
Thank you for your help, George!


Quoting George Andrews <gandrews at ntplx.net>:

Group,

The problem has been identified and solved. The operator sends his apologies
for the interference.

George

-----Original Message-----
From: 450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com [mailto:450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com]
On Behalf Of George Andrews
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:44 PM
To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450

Not yet. I want to give him 24 hrs to respond.

-----Original Message-----
From: 450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com [mailto:450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com]
On Behalf Of William Knapp / KC1WJ
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 6:29 PM
To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450

George - did you get a reply from N1BDF?



Quoting George Andrews <gandrews at ntplx.net>:

The other party to this packet issue is:

K1ZE, trustee for the club station W1SP Edward L Shekleton
51 Jared Sparks Road
Willington, CT 06279
United States

I don't have a phone number or e-mail address for him. I don't
remember enough about packet to determine the origination of the
transmission. I will follow up with N1BDF.

George


-----Original Message-----
From: 450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com
[mailto:450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com]
On Behalf Of David McKenzie
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 4:21 PM
To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450

Guess he hasn't checked his email yet. It's constant right now. Guess
it started yesterday?

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Rich <t41 at optonline.net> wrote:

Actually, its pretty low tech David.... 1200 baud packet is 20 year
old stuff...as you know. But I am glad I could be of help. When did
you guys first notice the packet? Its been going on all day, and its

pretty annoying.

I was talking to Robert at lunch and the bursts were taking him out
completely from the mobile.

Hopefully Georges's E-mail has the desired effect....



-----Original Message----- From: David McKenzie
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 2:24 PM

To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450

Look at you mr. High Tech richard!

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:23 AM, George Andrews <gandrews at ntplx.net>

wrote:


Group,

I know N1BDF and just sent him an e-mail informing him of the long
standing use (longer than I have been licensed) of 450 for simplex
use. Will let the group know what the response is.

George

-----Original Message-----
From: 450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com
[mailto:450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com]
On Behalf Of Rich
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:52 AM
To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450



OK been feeling a little under the weather the past 24hrs.... but
managed to turn on the radio and the PC this AM

So the stations on packet appear to be N1BDF in Shelton and W1SP in
Middletown. I tried to connect to them, but so far nothing. Gonna
switch to the vertical and try again.

So what is the consensus with the group? should we just leave it be
and maybe its just temporary, or should we contact them to let them
know about our longtime simplex usage of the freq?


heres some of the packets:

N1BDF-2*>ID [UI]:Network Node (BPQ)

N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]

_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450

_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450


_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450

_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450

_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450




_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450

_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450

_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450




_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450


_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.vhfwiki.com/pipermail/450/attachments/20130223/04035bd1/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450