[450] Packet on 450

Bob n1ujs at toast.net
Sat Feb 23 10:11:48 EST 2013


What protocol will you be using?  I'll connect now!

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:01 PM, chris <cralt at comcast.net> wrote:

> I hear no one on 450.. i guess i'll start up a packet BBS there :-/
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:35 PM, William Knapp / KC1WJ wrote:
>
>  Super awesome! Now I can put my radio back on.
>> Thank you for your help, George!
>>
>>
>> Quoting George Andrews <gandrews at ntplx.net>:
>>
>>  Group,
>>>
>>> The problem has been identified and solved. The operator sends his
>>> apologies
>>> for the interference.
>>>
>>> George
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: 450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com [mailto:450-bounces at lists.**
>>> vhfwiki.com <450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com>]
>>> On Behalf Of George Andrews
>>> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:44 PM
>>> To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>> Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450
>>>
>>> Not yet. I want to give him 24 hrs to respond.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: 450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com [mailto:450-bounces at lists.**
>>> vhfwiki.com <450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com>]
>>> On Behalf Of William Knapp / KC1WJ
>>> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 6:29 PM
>>> To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>> Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450
>>>
>>> George - did you get a reply from N1BDF?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Quoting George Andrews <gandrews at ntplx.net>:
>>>
>>>  The other party to this packet issue is:
>>>>
>>>> K1ZE, trustee for the club station W1SP Edward L Shekleton
>>>> 51 Jared Sparks Road
>>>> Willington, CT 06279
>>>> United States
>>>>
>>>> I don't have a phone number or e-mail address for him. I don't
>>>> remember enough about packet to determine the origination of the
>>>> transmission. I will follow up with N1BDF.
>>>>
>>>> George
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: 450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>>> [mailto:450-bounces at lists.**vhfwiki.com <450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com>
>>>> ]
>>>> On Behalf Of David McKenzie
>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 4:21 PM
>>>> To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450
>>>>
>>>> Guess he hasn't checked his email yet. It's constant right now. Guess
>>>> it started yesterday?
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Rich <t41 at optonline.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Actually, its pretty low tech David.... 1200 baud packet is 20 year
>>>>> old stuff...as you know. But I am glad I could be of help. When did
>>>>> you guys first notice the packet? Its been going on all day, and its
>>>>>
>>>> pretty annoying.
>>>>
>>>>> I was talking to Robert at lunch and the bursts were taking him out
>>>>> completely from the mobile.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hopefully Georges's E-mail has the desired effect....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: David McKenzie
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 2:24 PM
>>>>>
>>>>> To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>>>> Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450
>>>>>
>>>>> Look at you mr. High Tech richard!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:23 AM, George Andrews <gandrews at ntplx.net>
>>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Group,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know N1BDF and just sent him an e-mail informing him of the long
>>>>>> standing use (longer than I have been licensed) of 450 for simplex
>>>>>> use. Will let the group know what the response is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> George
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: 450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>>>>> [mailto:450-bounces at lists.**vhfwiki.com<450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com>
>>>>>> ]
>>>>>> On Behalf Of Rich
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:52 AM
>>>>>> To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK been feeling a little under the weather the past 24hrs.... but
>>>>>> managed to turn on the radio and the PC this AM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So the stations on packet appear to be N1BDF in Shelton and W1SP in
>>>>>> Middletown. I tried to connect to them, but so far nothing. Gonna
>>>>>> switch to the vertical and try again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So what is the consensus with the group? should we just leave it be
>>>>>> and maybe its just temporary, or should we contact them to let them
>>>>>> know about our longtime simplex usage of the freq?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> heres some of the packets:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> N1BDF-2*>ID [UI]:Network Node (BPQ)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>>> 450 mailing list
>>>>>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>>>>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/450<http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>>> 450 mailing list
>>>>>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>>>>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/450<http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>> 450 mailing list
>>>>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>>>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/450<http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450>
>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>> 450 mailing list
>>>>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>>>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/450<http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450>
>>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> 450 mailing list
>>>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/450<http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> 450 mailing list
>>>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/450<http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> 450 mailing list
>>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/450<http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450>
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> 450 mailing list
>>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/450<http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450>
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> 450 mailing list
>>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/450<http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> 450 mailing list
>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/450<http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450>
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> 450 mailing list
> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/450<http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.vhfwiki.com/pipermail/450/attachments/20130223/63a8060e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450


More information about the 450 mailing list