[450] Monitoring 6m

[Rich Florio]

Actually, that frequency is no good here either. I have some sort of heavy
interference at ~50.300 and up to 450. Not sure if its cable leakage or
what but its pinning the meter
Dave says it Q-65

Might be one of my neighbors.


There is a fine line between Genius and Insanity.


On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 5:14 PM John Foege <john.foege at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok. Calling CQ on 50.450
>
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023, 4:54 PM John Foege <john.foege at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Let me re-adjust my 10m/6m fan dipole and I will be back with you all
>> shortly
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023, 4:42 PM Robert Busino <n1ujs at toast.net> wrote:
>>
>>> While my antenna IS broken, I could PROBABLY work you, if you come up
>>> with a frequency.  The broken antenna is pointing East, and has the Kenwood
>>> TS-60 hooked to it through a tuner.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From*: "John Foege" <john.foege at gmail.com>
>>> *Sent*: Thursday, December 14, 2023 4:38 PM
>>> *To*: "144.450 Mailing List" <450 at lists.vhfwiki.com>
>>> *Subject*: [Spam?] Re: [450] Monitoring 6m
>>>
>>> Scratch that. Let me find a better freq
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023, 4:37?PM John Foege <john.foege at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 51.450 MHz
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 450 mailing list
>>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> 450 mailing list
> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.vhfwiki.com/pipermail/450/attachments/20231215/00e72d2a/attachment.html>