[450] Spoke with comet / ngc

[David Garcia]

Yep they still have it https://www.dxengineering.com/parts/csh-a14810s


On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:42 PM, William Knapp / WA1WK <wa1wk at wa1wk.com>
wrote:

>
> Yeah - That's the one. I don't know if they make it anymore though.
>
>
> Quoting David Garcia <wb2rxf at gmail.com>:
>
> This one? Cushcraft A14810S its either vertical or horizontal, some time in
>> the past I believe bob had setup his beams to go vertical or horizontal
>> with inexpensive rotors, I could be wrong.
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:32 PM, William Knapp / WA1WK <wa1wk at wa1wk.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Does Cuhshcraft still make the 10 element Vertical / Horizontal beam?
>>> That's what Bob uses. He just took off the vertical elements. It's not
>>> the
>>> most optimized antenna in the world, but I think it might work better
>>> than
>>> an antenna made for satellite work.
>>> I did a search for it, but didn't come up with anything. You might be
>>> able
>>> to find something used on QRZ. It certainly would be less expensive than
>>> the M2
>>>
>>> 73
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Quoting David Garcia <wb2rxf at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> I did a search on google, and a very few have an issue, but when it does
>>>
>>>> happen its a "solder joint" or bad capacitors, I'm borrowing kc2dyys
>>>> dual
>>>> band base comet, and see how that works out, while I wait for the turn
>>>> around time. Gonna do it asap before this arctic level cold snap sets
>>>> in.
>>>> Probably wed or thursday. I'm considering in the next few months to get
>>>> M2s
>>>> smallest circular polarized antenna 7ele, I called & asked if I could
>>>> make
>>>> it with a switch for vertical & horizontal use, he explained, all I need
>>>> to
>>>> do call and ask for 2nd driven element. It sounds good on paper, but
>>>> was a
>>>> nightmare when I did so with the 5element beam from K1FO. But I don't
>>>> have
>>>> the space to put 2 vertical and 2 horizontal, because I'd like to do the
>>>> same with a 70cm circular polarized beam. Oh well I'll we'll see what
>>>> happens when the time comes.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:59 AM, William Knapp / WA1WK <wa1wk at wa1wk.com
>>>> >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Those are typically really good antennas. Sorry you got a bad one and
>>>> had
>>>>
>>>>> to go through all the trouble to re-pack it, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Good luck!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Quoting David Garcia <wb2rxf at gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> They said send it in, they would do a thorough check up on the CX333,
>>>>> the
>>>>>
>>>>> swr is just to erratic. So many great reviews & I got the lemon.
>>>>>> Keeping
>>>>>> my
>>>>>> fingers crossed. Glad I didn't throw the box the masts came in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> WA1WK FN31kn
>>>>> New Haven County, CT
>>>>> ITU Zone 8, CQ Zone 5
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> 450 mailing list
>>>>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>>>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> --
>>> WA1WK FN31kn
>>> New Haven County, CT
>>> ITU Zone 8, CQ Zone 5
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 450 mailing list
>>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> WA1WK FN31kn
> New Haven County, CT
> ITU Zone 8, CQ Zone 5
>
> _______________________________________________
> 450 mailing list
> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.vhfwiki.com/pipermail/450/attachments/20161207/65f6d925/attachment.html>