[450] frustrating

K1FSY k1fsy at vhfwiki.com
Sat Apr 9 14:26:19 UTC 2016


It's usually a lightning key chatfest in my experience.

On 4/9/2016 10:31 AM, Shawn Zupp wrote:
> I have shared this frustration at times as a weak signal distant
> operator. Have begun to view the group as more rag chew-oriented as time
> has gone on.  
> 
> On Apr 09, 2016, at 06:37 AM, Robert Busino <n1ujs at toast.net> wrote:
> 
>> Listening to ".205"
>> "You would think" that if someone went to the effort to build the
>> infrastructure (streaming audio, remote station, etc.) promote the
>> activity, and then BE there to "run" things, that those he did it for
>> would be courteous enough to take local QSO's off frequency rather
>> than make things more difficult for "net control".....especially when
>> they can obviously hear him, AND the point is to bring in ll the
>> distant stations who likely listening to this circus wouldn't even be
>> bothered.  I could burn a hole in the frequency with the Beko, but
>> why?  I'm not interested in listening to myself or just being heard, I
>> want to HEAR someone else and get what they have to say!!!
>> Phooey.  Old guys should know better.
>>  
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> 450 mailing list
>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com <mailto:450 at lists.vhfwiki.com>
>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 450 mailing list
> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
> 


More information about the 450 mailing list