[450] Packet on 450

[William Knapp / KC1WJ]

Super awesome! Now I can put my radio back on.
Thank you for your help, George!


Quoting George Andrews <gandrews at ntplx.net>:

> Group,
>
> The problem has been identified and solved. The operator sends his apologies
> for the interference.
>
> George
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com [mailto:450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com]
> On Behalf Of George Andrews
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:44 PM
> To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450
>
> Not yet. I want to give him 24 hrs to respond.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com [mailto:450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com]
> On Behalf Of William Knapp / KC1WJ
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 6:29 PM
> To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450
>
> George - did you get a reply from N1BDF?
>
>
>
> Quoting George Andrews <gandrews at ntplx.net>:
>
>> The other party to this packet issue is:
>>
>> K1ZE, trustee for the club station W1SP Edward L Shekleton
>> 51 Jared Sparks Road
>> Willington, CT 06279
>> United States
>>
>> I don't have a phone number or e-mail address for him. I don't
>> remember enough about packet to determine the origination of the
>> transmission. I will follow up with N1BDF.
>>
>> George
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: 450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com
>> [mailto:450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com]
>> On Behalf Of David McKenzie
>> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 4:21 PM
>> To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>> Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450
>>
>> Guess he hasn't checked his email yet. It's constant right now. Guess
>> it started yesterday?
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Rich <t41 at optonline.net> wrote:
>>> Actually, its pretty low tech David.... 1200 baud packet is 20 year
>>> old stuff...as you know. But I am glad I could be of help. When did
>>> you guys first notice the packet? Its been going on all day, and its
>> pretty annoying.
>>> I was talking to Robert at lunch and the bursts were taking him out
>>> completely from the mobile.
>>>
>>> Hopefully Georges's E-mail has the desired effect....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: David McKenzie
>>> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 2:24 PM
>>>
>>> To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>> Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450
>>>
>>> Look at you mr. High Tech richard!
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:23 AM, George Andrews <gandrews at ntplx.net>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Group,
>>>>
>>>> I know N1BDF and just sent him an e-mail informing him of the long
>>>> standing use (longer than I have been licensed) of 450 for simplex
>>>> use. Will let the group know what the response is.
>>>>
>>>> George
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: 450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>>> [mailto:450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com]
>>>> On Behalf Of Rich
>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:52 AM
>>>> To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OK been feeling a little under the weather the past 24hrs.... but
>>>> managed to turn on the radio and the PC this AM
>>>>
>>>> So the stations on packet appear to be N1BDF in Shelton and W1SP in
>>>> Middletown. I tried to connect to them, but so far nothing. Gonna
>>>> switch to the vertical and try again.
>>>>
>>>> So what is the consensus with the group? should we just leave it be
>>>> and maybe its just temporary, or should we contact them to let them
>>>> know about our longtime simplex usage of the freq?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> heres some of the packets:
>>>>
>>>> N1BDF-2*>ID [UI]:Network Node (BPQ)
>>>>
>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> 450 mailing list
>>>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> 450 mailing list
>>>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 450 mailing list
>>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 450 mailing list
>>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
>> _______________________________________________
>> 450 mailing list
>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 450 mailing list
>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 450 mailing list
> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
>
> _______________________________________________
> 450 mailing list
> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
>
> _______________________________________________
> 450 mailing list
> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
>



_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450