[450] Packet on 450

[Bob]

Yes indeed...thank you George!

Heard you call on 223.5, but as usual there is a reception
differential....you did not hear me respond.

Thanks for the call though!

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:33 PM, George Andrews <gandrews at ntplx.net> wrote:

> Group,
>
> The problem has been identified and solved. The operator sends his
> apologies
> for the interference.
>
> George
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com [mailto:450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com]
> On Behalf Of George Andrews
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:44 PM
> To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450
>
> Not yet. I want to give him 24 hrs to respond.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com [mailto:450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com]
> On Behalf Of William Knapp / KC1WJ
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 6:29 PM
> To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450
>
> George - did you get a reply from N1BDF?
>
>
>
> Quoting George Andrews <gandrews at ntplx.net>:
>
> > The other party to this packet issue is:
> >
> > K1ZE, trustee for the club station W1SP Edward L Shekleton
> > 51 Jared Sparks Road
> > Willington, CT 06279
> > United States
> >
> > I don't have a phone number or e-mail address for him. I don't
> > remember enough about packet to determine the origination of the
> > transmission. I will follow up with N1BDF.
> >
> > George
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: 450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com
> > [mailto:450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com]
> > On Behalf Of David McKenzie
> > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 4:21 PM
> > To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> > Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450
> >
> > Guess he hasn't checked his email yet. It's constant right now. Guess
> > it started yesterday?
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Rich <t41 at optonline.net> wrote:
> >> Actually, its pretty low tech David.... 1200 baud packet is 20 year
> >> old stuff...as you know. But I am glad I could be of help. When did
> >> you guys first notice the packet? Its been going on all day, and its
> > pretty annoying.
> >> I was talking to Robert at lunch and the bursts were taking him out
> >> completely from the mobile.
> >>
> >> Hopefully Georges's E-mail has the desired effect....
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message----- From: David McKenzie
> >> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 2:24 PM
> >>
> >> To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> >> Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450
> >>
> >> Look at you mr. High Tech richard!
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:23 AM, George Andrews <gandrews at ntplx.net>
> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Group,
> >>>
> >>> I know N1BDF and just sent him an e-mail informing him of the long
> >>> standing use (longer than I have been licensed) of 450 for simplex
> >>> use. Will let the group know what the response is.
> >>>
> >>> George
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: 450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com
> >>> [mailto:450-bounces at lists.vhfwiki.com]
> >>> On Behalf Of Rich
> >>> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 9:52 AM
> >>> To: 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> >>> Subject: Re: [450] Packet on 450
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> OK been feeling a little under the weather the past 24hrs.... but
> >>> managed to turn on the radio and the PC this AM
> >>>
> >>> So the stations on packet appear to be N1BDF in Shelton and W1SP in
> >>> Middletown. I tried to connect to them, but so far nothing. Gonna
> >>> switch to the vertical and try again.
> >>>
> >>> So what is the consensus with the group? should we just leave it be
> >>> and maybe its just temporary, or should we contact them to let them
> >>> know about our longtime simplex usage of the freq?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> heres some of the packets:
> >>>
> >>> N1BDF-2*>ID [UI]:Network Node (BPQ)
> >>>
> >>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
> >>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
> >>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
> >>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
> >>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
> >>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
> >>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
> >>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
> >>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
> >>> N1BDF-2*>W1SP-11 [C,P]
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> 450 mailing list
> >>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> >>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> 450 mailing list
> >>> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> >>> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> 450 mailing list
> >> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> >> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> 450 mailing list
> >> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> >> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
> > _______________________________________________
> > 450 mailing list
> > 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> > http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > 450 mailing list
> > 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> > http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 450 mailing list
> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
>
> _______________________________________________
> 450 mailing list
> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
>
> _______________________________________________
> 450 mailing list
> 450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
> http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.vhfwiki.com/pipermail/450/attachments/20130221/a6a2d5b9/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450