[450] repeater report

[Bob]

Interesting, indeed.
I did note that like 2 meters, "after dark" seems to be good for about an s-unit or so....mine were all done during the heat of the day, but tuning around tonight I noticed the improvement.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: George Andrews 
  To: 144.450 Mailing List 
  Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2010 9:30 PM
  Subject: Re: [450] repeater report


  Bob,

  Here is my results. Things were better earlier in the year!

  George
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Bob 
    To: 144.450 Mailing List 
    Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2010 7:59 PM
    Subject: [450] repeater report


    Just finished "kerchunking" every known 222 repeater pair, using every known PL.
    All done on the CX-333 @ 45' with no amp, no preamp. AEA Isopole, ~22'. 50 W no preamp.
    Here is the list of what I got and how I got 'em.

    By the way, signal report will be represented by "sB" (busy light, which is roughly 0-3 S-units best I can figure), or numerically (s1-s5), based on my 5 segment meter.

    223.78 Torrington, CT     82.5               s5/sB
    223.80 Harriman, NY       107.2             s5/Nothing            
    223.82 Pamona, NY         85.4              sB+ /Nothing   
    223.86 West Islip, LI       110.9/156.7  sB /sB       
    223.88 Milford, CT           77                  sB+ /Nothing, did receive earlier in the year
    223.94 Manhattan, NYC   107.2            sB /Nothing       
    224.02 Carmel, NY           136               s5/sB
    224.10 Fairfield, CT          no PL           sB+/Nothing        
    224.12 Vernon, CT           82.5              s3/s3    
    224.16 Bristol, CT             77                 s3/s1    
    224.22 Bristol, CT            118.8             s5/s5    
    224.24 Fort Lee, NJ         107.2            sB+/Nothing    
    224.32 Warren, CT           77                  s5/s2    
    224.36 Vernon, CT           77                  s2/sB    
    224.38 Orangetown, NY   114.8            sB/Nothing
    224.40 Valhalla, NY           114.8            sB/Nothing 
    224.50 West Haven, CT   77                 sB/sB to iffy, Did receive better earlier in the year    
    224.60 Vernon, CT           123               s1 /s2   
    224.68 Rocky Hill, CT       123               s1/s1
    224.68 Yaphank, LI           103.5            sB/sB   
    224.70 Mahopac NY          no PL           s4 /Nothing  
    224.74 Pelham, MA        88.5               sB
    224.80 Meriden, CT           77                s3/s4    
    224.80 Passaic, NJ           141.3           s2  (this one is a KQ2H linked machine)/Nothing
    224.82 Queens, NYC        no PL           s1/Nothing    
    224.86 Farmingville, LI     107.2            sB/sB    
    224.88 Patterson, NY        no PL           s2/Nothing    
    224.90 Rocky Point, LI     123               s1/Nothing
    224.94 Avon, CT               no PL           s2/s1
    224.96 Bridgeport, CT      77                 sB/sB, sometimes nothing. Was better earlier in the day  

    My tests conducted after dark
    There you have it for what it's worth. 

    I'm not really impressed.  Is it the antenna?  The band?  Do people not put enough effort into their 222 machines? 
    Hard to say.

        


----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    _______________________________________________
    450 mailing list
    450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
    http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  450 mailing list
  450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
  http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.vhfwiki.com/pipermail/450/attachments/20100704/d2507142/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450