[450] repeater report
George Andrews
gandrews at ntplx.net
Sun Jul 4 20:56:27 EDT 2010
Yes, on at 8:58 for ten minutes
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob
To: 144.450 Mailing List
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2010 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: [450] repeater report
I was on, but I had gone upstairs for a few minutes.....are you coming back?
----- Original Message -----
From: George Andrews
To: 144.450 Mailing List
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2010 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: [450] repeater report
Bob,
Are you on 223.500? I called a few times, no response. Maybe I can't get from here to there on 223.500!
George
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob
To: 144.450 Mailing List
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2010 7:59 PM
Subject: [450] repeater report
Just finished "kerchunking" every known 222 repeater pair, using every known PL.
All done on the CX-333 @ 45' with no amp, no preamp.
Here is the list of what I got and how I got 'em.
By the way, signal report will be represented by "sB" (busy light, which is roughly 0-3 S-units best I can figure), or numerically (s1-s5), based on my 5 segment meter.
223.78 Torrington, CT 82.5 s5
223.80 Harriman, NY 107.2 s5
223.82 Pamona, NY 85.4 sB+
223.86 West Islip, LI 110.9/156.7 sB
223.88 Milford, CT 77 sB+
223.94 Manhattan, NYC 107.2 sB
224.02 Carmel, NY 136 s5
224.10 Fairfield, CT no PL sB+
224.12 Vernon, CT 82.5 s3
224.16 Bristol, CT 77 s3
224.22 Bristol, CT 118.8 s5
224.24 Fort Lee, NJ 107.2 sB+
224.32 Warren, CT 77 s5
224.36 Vernon, CT 77 s2
224.38 Orangetown, NY 114.8 sB
224.40 Valhalla, NY 114.8 sB
224.50 West Haven, CT 77 sB
224.60 Vernon, CT 123 s1
224.68 Rocky Hill, CT 123 s1
224.68 Yaphank, LI 103.5 sB
224.70 Mahopac NY no PL s4
224.80 Meriden, CT 77 s3
224.80 Passaic, NJ 141.3 s2 (this one is a KQ2H linked machine)
224.82 Queens, NYC no PL s1
224.86 Farmingville, LI 107.2 sB
224.88 Patterson, NY no PL s2
224.90 Rocky Point, LI 123 s1
224.94 Avon, CT no PL s2
224.96 Bridgeport, CT 77 sB
There you have it for what it's worth.
I'm not really impressed. Is it the antenna? The band? Do people not put enough effort into their 222 machines?
Hard to say.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.vhfwiki.com/pipermail/450/attachments/20100704/4b8e9f99/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
450 mailing list
450 at lists.vhfwiki.com
http://lists.vhfwiki.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/450
More information about the 450
mailing list